<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>nSourceIT</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.nsourceit.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.nsourceit.com</link>
	<description>Information Technology, e-Discovery, and Litigation Support Services</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 14:20:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Open Source OCR that makes searchable PDFs</title>
		<link>http://www.nsourceit.com/2010/07/27/open-source-ocr-that-makes-searchable-pdfs/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nsourceit.com/2010/07/27/open-source-ocr-that-makes-searchable-pdfs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 14:20:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ed Valio</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ED.IT Blog Posting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OCR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[open source]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PDF]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nsourceit.com/?p=861</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From Slashdot: &#8221;In my job all of our multifunction copiers scan to PDF but many of our users want and expect those PDFs to be text searchable. I looked around for software that would create text searchable pdfs but most are very expensive and I couldn&#8217;t find any that were open source (free). I did [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From Slashdot: &#8221;In my job all of our multifunction copiers scan to PDF but many of our users want and expect those PDFs to be text searchable. I looked around for software that would create text searchable pdfs but most are very expensive and I couldn&#8217;t find any that were open source (free). I did find some open source packages like CuneiForm and Exactimage that could in theory do the job, but they were hard to install and difficult to set up and use over a network.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-862" title="opensource" src="http://www.nsourceit.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/opensource.jpg" alt="" width="273" height="184" /></p>
<p>Then I stumbled upon WatchOCR. This is a Live CD distro that can easily create a server on your network that provides an OCR service using watched folders. Now all my scanners scan to a watched folder, WatchOCR picks up those files and OCRs them, and then spits them out into another folder. It uses CuneiForm and ExactImage but it is all configured and ready to deploy. It can even be remotely managed via the Web interface.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://linux.slashdot.org/story/10/07/22/1852234/Open-Source-OCR-That-Makes-Searchable-PDFs" target="_blank">Slashdot &#8211; Open Source OCR That Makes Searchable PDFs</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nsourceit.com/2010/07/27/open-source-ocr-that-makes-searchable-pdfs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dell: 90% of data is never read again</title>
		<link>http://www.nsourceit.com/2010/07/13/dell-90-of-data-is-never-read-again/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nsourceit.com/2010/07/13/dell-90-of-data-is-never-read-again/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jul 2010 15:53:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ed Valio</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ED.IT Blog Posting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[best practices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IT departments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[storage]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nsourceit.com/?p=857</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From PC Pro: &#8221;According to Dell, 90% of company data is written once and never read again.  This arresting claim cropped up in the middle of a presentation from Dell’s Enterprise division, recently given to Jon Honeyball and me. Given our usual style of dealing with such events, the poor devils didn’t stand a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From <a href="http://www.pcpro.co.uk/realworld/359293/dell-90-of-data-is-never-read-again" target="_blank">PC Pro</a>: &#8221;According to Dell, 90% of company data is written once and never read again.  This arresting claim cropped up in the middle of a presentation from Dell’s Enterprise division, recently given to Jon Honeyball and me. Given our usual style of dealing with such events, the poor devils didn’t stand a chance of actually working though their prepared order of slides, and I’d have to confess that we didn’t even try to stick to the script we’d discussed in the run-up to the meeting.</p>
<p><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-858" title="data" src="http://www.nsourceit.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/data.jpg" alt="" width="347" height="346" /></p>
<p>But even allowing for our natural tendency towards anarchy, this statement stood right out from the other stuff in the presentation.  It’s an odd statistic. How is that data measured? 90% of all documents? 90% of stored bytes? When they said “ever again” did they mean explicitly retrieved by name, or should we include free text searches in that statistic? How long an interval needs to pass before some piece of data is clearly identified as belonging to the 90%, so that steps can be taken to reflect its reduced importance?  These questions are just the starting point for an issue that demands quite a lot of thinking. It’s a fascinating finding to be offered to you by a vendor of servers, given that so few of the devices they try to sell to smaller organisations actually reflect this “fact” in their hardware and software specification.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.pcpro.co.uk/realworld/359293/dell-90-of-data-is-never-read-again" target="_blank">PC Pro &#8211; Dell: 90% of data is never read again</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nsourceit.com/2010/07/13/dell-90-of-data-is-never-read-again/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>iOS 4: Exchange may not sync after update</title>
		<link>http://www.nsourceit.com/2010/06/30/ios-4-exchange-may-not-sync-after-update/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nsourceit.com/2010/06/30/ios-4-exchange-may-not-sync-after-update/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jun 2010 16:25:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ed Valio</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ED.IT Blog Posting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Exchange]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iOS4]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nsourceit.com/?p=854</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From support.apple.com &#8211; &#8221;Symptoms - Immediately after updating to iOS 4, some users may notice that Exchange ActiveSync Mail, Contacts, or Calendars do not sync, or sync very slowly. In addition, some Exchange Server administrators may notice their servers running slowly.

Products Affected
iPod touch, iPhone 3G, iPhone 4, iPhone 3GS
Resolution
To work around this issue, users should install [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From support.apple.com &#8211; &#8221;Symptoms - Immediately after updating to iOS 4, some users may notice that Exchange ActiveSync Mail, Contacts, or Calendars do not sync, or sync very slowly. In addition, some Exchange Server administrators may notice their servers running slowly.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><img class="aligncenter size-medium wp-image-855" title="ios4" src="http://www.nsourceit.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/ios4-608x286.jpg" alt="" width="608" height="286" /></p>
<p>Products Affected<br />
iPod touch, iPhone 3G, iPhone 4, iPhone 3GS<br />
Resolution<br />
To work around this issue, users should install a configuration profile from Apple that increases the amount of time the iOS 4 device will wait for the Exchange Server to respond to its sync requests. For best results, the profile should be installed on as many iOS 4 devices at your company as possible.</p>
<p>To install the profile:</p>
<p>Use Safari on your iOS 4 device to <a href="http://support.apple.com/kb/TS3398" target="_blank">download the configuration profile.</a> It may be easiest to read this article with your iPhone or iPod touch and tap the download link there, but you may also email the attachment to another email account on your iOS 4 device, and tap the attachment to open it.<br />
Tap Install to install the profile, and enter your passcode if prompted.<br />
A warning message will appear because the profile is not signed. Tap Install Now.<br />
Tap Done to complete the installation, then power off your device and power it back on.<br />
Wait for your Exchange data to finish syncing.<br />
After installation, the profile will be listed under Settings &gt; General &gt; Profile.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://support.apple.com/kb/TS3398" target="_blank">support.apple.com &#8211; iOS 4: Exchange Mail, Contacts, or Calendars may not sync after update</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nsourceit.com/2010/06/30/ios-4-exchange-may-not-sync-after-update/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google Voice now available without an invitation</title>
		<link>http://www.nsourceit.com/2010/06/22/google-voice-now-available-without-an-invitation/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nsourceit.com/2010/06/22/google-voice-now-available-without-an-invitation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jun 2010 18:18:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ed Valio</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ED.IT Blog Posting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GoogleVoice]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nsourceit.com/?p=850</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From the Google Voice Blog:  &#8221;A little over a year ago, we released an early preview of Google Voice, our web-based platform for managing your communications. We introduced one number to ring all your phones, voicemail that works like email, free calls and text messages to the U.S. and Canada, low-priced international calls and more—the only [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From the Google Voice Blog:  &#8221;A little over a year ago, we released an <a href="http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2009/03/here-comes-google-voice.html">early preview</a> of Google Voice, our web-based platform for managing your communications. We introduced one number to ring all your phones, voicemail that works like email, free calls and text messages to the U.S. and Canada, low-priced international calls and more—the only catch was you had to request and receive an invite to try it out. Today, after lots of testing and tweaking, we’re excited to open up Google Voice to the public, no invitation required.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-851" title="gv" src="http://www.nsourceit.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/gv.jpg" alt="" width="111" height="111" /></p>
<p>Over the past year, we’ve introduced a <a href="http://googlevoiceblog.blogspot.com/2010/01/google-voice-for-iphone-and-palm-webos.html">mobile web app</a>, an <a href="http://googlevoiceblog.blogspot.com/2009/09/play-voicemails-right-from-gmail.html">integrated voicemail player in Gmail</a>, the ability to use <a href="http://googlevoiceblog.blogspot.com/2009/10/google-voice-with-your-existing-number.html">Google Voice with your existing number</a> and <a href="http://www.google.com/googlevoice/whatsnew.html">more</a>. Over a million of you are now actively using Google Voice, and many of the features released over the past year (like <a href="http://googlevoiceblog.blogspot.com/2009/09/receive-and-reply-to-sms-messages-by.html">SMS to email</a> and our <a href="http://googlevoiceblog.blogspot.com/2010/01/new-google-voice-extension-for-chrome.html">Chrome extension</a>) came as a result of your suggestions, so thanks!</p>
<p>If you haven’t yet tried Google Voice, we can’t wait for you to try it out and <a href="http://www.google.com/support/forum/p/voice?hl=en">let us know what you think</a>. Check out our revamped <a href="http://www.google.com/googlevoice/about.html">features page</a> to learn about everything Google Voice can do&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>Google Voice Blog &#8211; Google Voice for everyone</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nsourceit.com/2010/06/22/google-voice-now-available-without-an-invitation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>PrintConductor Prints Documents in Batches Without Opening Them</title>
		<link>http://www.nsourceit.com/2010/05/27/printconductor-prints-documents-in-batches-without-opening-them/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nsourceit.com/2010/05/27/printconductor-prints-documents-in-batches-without-opening-them/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 May 2010 15:43:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ed Valio</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ED.IT Blog Posting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[batch printing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[best practices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tips & tricks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nsourceit.com/?p=844</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From Addictivetips: &#8221;Lets say you want to print different types of documents in one go, such as, Adobe PDF, Word Document, Wordpad text, Excel spreadsheet, Visio or AutoCAD diagram, and so on. The only way would be to manually open each one of them and click Print. This is a tiresome procedure which will waste [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From <a href="http://www.addictivetips.com/windows-tips/batch-print-19-different-document-types-together/" target="_blank">Addictivetips</a>: &#8221;Lets say you want to print different types of documents in one go, such as, Adobe PDF, Word Document, Wordpad text, Excel spreadsheet, Visio or AutoCAD diagram, and so on. The only way would be to manually open each one of them and click Print. This is a tiresome procedure which will waste half of your day (if you do a lot of printing at work).</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><img class="aligncenter size-thumbnail wp-image-845" title="insert_coin" src="http://www.nsourceit.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/insert_coin-121x91.jpg" alt="" width="121" height="91" /></p>
<p>Luckily we have discovered a lifesaver, called PrintConductor. This nifty little tool helps in batch printing multiple document types. According to the developer, it supports 16 document types, which includes, PDF, DOC, WRI, WPS, RTF, TXT, XLS, PPT, PPS, POT, VSD, DWG, DXF, SNP, HTM, and HTML. While testing, I found that it also supports the latest DOCX, XLSX, and PPTX formats, making the total supported file types to 19.</p>
<p>It uses the COM/DDE interfaces of the official applications in order to print, which means that it will first detect the installed document readers and editors before allowing user to add the documents for batch printing. This has one downside, i.e, you cannot add PDF files for printing unless you have Adobe Acrobat installed, the same problem arises with other formats where the original program must be installed.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.addictivetips.com/windows-tips/batch-print-19-different-document-types-together/" target="_blank">Addictivetips &#8211; Batch Print 19 Different Document Types Together</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nsourceit.com/2010/05/27/printconductor-prints-documents-in-batches-without-opening-them/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Citrix shows off new XenClient desktop hypervisor</title>
		<link>http://www.nsourceit.com/2010/05/13/citrix-shows-off-new-xenclient-desktop-hypervisor/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nsourceit.com/2010/05/13/citrix-shows-off-new-xenclient-desktop-hypervisor/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 May 2010 17:49:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ed Valio</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ED.IT Blog Posting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Citrix]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[remote users]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[virtualization]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nsourceit.com/?p=840</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From ARS Technica: &#8221;Citrix has announced the first public release of its XenClient virtualization platform, formerly known as Project Independence. Built on top of the Xen hypervisor, the new product offers high-performance virtualization for corporate desktops and mobile users.
Hypervisor-based virtualization is commonplace in the server room, but thus far the technology has not made it [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From <a href="http://arstechnica.com/business/news/2010/05/citrix-shows-off-new-xenclient-desktop-hypervisor.ars" target="_blank">ARS Technica</a>: &#8221;Citrix has announced the first public release of its XenClient virtualization platform, formerly known as Project Independence. Built on top of the Xen hypervisor, the new product offers high-performance virtualization for corporate desktops and mobile users.</p>
<p>Hypervisor-based virtualization is commonplace in the server room, but thus far the technology has not made it to the desktop; desktop-based virtualization products like Microsoft&#8217;s Virtual PC and VMware Workstation run virtual machines on top of a full OS. This makes virtualization a heavyweight solution for those wanting to use desktop virtualization to provide a consistent, easy-to-manage environment, which has limited its acceptance.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-841" title="citrixready" src="http://www.nsourceit.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/citrixready.gif" alt="" width="69" height="125" /></p>
<p>Citrix is also promoting the use of the product as a way for organizations to allow users to run securely locked-down VMs alongside less secure—but more user-friendly—environments, even to the extent of giving a &#8220;corporate desktop&#8221; on a privately-owned PC. The corporate VM can have all the security policies, virus protection, VPN software, and other corporate tools, safely protected from any damage by software that the user might run in the unrestricted VM.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://arstechnica.com/business/news/2010/05/citrix-shows-off-new-xenclient-desktop-hypervisor.ars" target="_blank">ARS Technica &#8211; Citrix shows off new XenClient desktop hypervisor</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nsourceit.com/2010/05/13/citrix-shows-off-new-xenclient-desktop-hypervisor/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Corporations in-sourcing early case assessment (ECA)</title>
		<link>http://www.nsourceit.com/2010/05/10/corporations-in-sourcing-early-case-assessment-eca/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nsourceit.com/2010/05/10/corporations-in-sourcing-early-case-assessment-eca/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 May 2010 18:17:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ed Valio</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ED.IT Blog Posting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ECA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[insourcing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trends]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nsourceit.com/?p=835</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From The e-Discovery Paradigm Shift:  &#8221;Many eDiscovery vendors and consultants have seen more eDiscovery work moving back to the corporations. And, based on surveys over the past 12 months and direct discussions with eDiscovery decision makers within corporations, most industry analysts have predicted that eDiscovery work is moving back to the corporations at an accelerating [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From <a href="http://ediscoveryconsulting.blogspot.com/2010/05/early-case-assessment-eca-moving-to.html" target="_blank">The e-Discovery Paradigm Shift</a>:  &#8221;Many eDiscovery vendors and consultants have seen more eDiscovery work moving back to the corporations. And, based on surveys over the past 12 months and direct discussions with eDiscovery decision makers within corporations, most industry analysts have predicted that eDiscovery work is moving back to the corporations at an accelerating rate.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-836" title="insource" src="http://www.nsourceit.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/insource.jpg" alt="" width="115" height="150" /></p>
<p>Now, The Cowan Group has confirmed this trend through the results of its &#8220;Q1 Critical Trends Survey&#8221;. Collecting responses from 47 major corporations on their current workload, as well as near-term plans for technical and talent acquisitions, The Cowan Group is reporting that 22% of the corporations that they surveys are expecting to in-source more eDiscovery work within the next 90 days.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://ediscoveryconsulting.blogspot.com/2010/05/early-case-assessment-eca-moving-to.html" target="_blank">The e-Discovery Paradigm Shift &#8211; Early Case Assessment (ECA) moving to the corporations</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nsourceit.com/2010/05/10/corporations-in-sourcing-early-case-assessment-eca/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google Apps customers getting more Google applications</title>
		<link>http://www.nsourceit.com/2010/05/07/google-apps-customers-getting-more-google-applications/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nsourceit.com/2010/05/07/google-apps-customers-getting-more-google-applications/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 May 2010 16:07:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ed Valio</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ED.IT Blog Posting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cloud computing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IT News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nsourceit.com/?p=831</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From the Google Enterprise Blog: &#8221;9 of the top 20 requests from Google Apps customers are for their accounts to work with more services from Google, not just for the core suite of messaging and collaboration applications. Later this year we’ll dramatically accelerate customer access to innovation, and give users the convenience of using any [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From the <a href="http://googleenterprise.blogspot.com/2010/05/more-google-applications-coming-for.html" target="_blank">Google Enterprise Blog</a>: &#8221;9 of the top 20 requests from Google Apps customers are for their accounts to work with more services from Google, not just for the core suite of messaging and collaboration applications. Later this year we’ll dramatically accelerate customer access to innovation, and give users the convenience of using any Google service allowed by their administrator from a single account affiliated with their organization.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-832" title="googleapps" src="http://www.nsourceit.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/googleapps.jpg" alt="" width="452" height="337" /></p>
<p>For example, coworkers will be able to publish their organization’s blog on Blogger, share project images with Picasa Web Albums, track industry news in Google Reader, advertise online with AdWords and much more, all without switching back and forth between multiple accounts. While these additional applications won’t initially be covered by the core suite’s support and service level agreement, this change will open up the spectrum of Google’s functionality to businesses, schools and organizations using Google Apps and we’ll evaluate future support options.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://googleenterprise.blogspot.com/2010/05/more-google-applications-coming-for.html" target="_blank">Official Google Enterprise Blog &#8211; More Google applications coming for Google Apps customers</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nsourceit.com/2010/05/07/google-apps-customers-getting-more-google-applications/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Apple&#8217;s Next iPhone?</title>
		<link>http://www.nsourceit.com/2010/04/19/apples-next-iphone/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nsourceit.com/2010/04/19/apples-next-iphone/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Apr 2010 17:31:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David Kaszowicz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ED.IT Blog Posting]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nsourceit.com/?p=827</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From Gizmodo: &#8220;You are looking at Apple&#8217;s next iPhone. It was found lost in a bar in Redwood City, camouflaged to look like an iPhone 3GS. We got it. We disassembled it. It&#8217;s the real thing, and here are all the details.


              [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5520164/this-is-apples-next-iphone" target="_blank">Gizmodo</a>: &#8220;You are looking at Apple&#8217;s <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #nextiphone" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/nextiphone/"><span style="color: #303030;">next iPhone</span></a>. It was found lost in a bar in Redwood City, camouflaged to look like an iPhone 3GS. We got it. We disassembled it. It&#8217;s the real thing, and here are all the details.</p>
<div class="GalleryPreview">
<h3><a href="http://gizmodo.com/5520155/gal-1/gallery/"></a></h3>
<div id="AjaxImagePosts" class="gallery-thumb-wrapper"><a id="img1017086452" class="imagewidth_1024" href="http://gizmodo.com/5520155/gal-1//gallery/1"><img class="gpreview-img" src="http://cache-02.gawkerassets.com/assets/images/4/2010/04/gallery_iphone1.jpg" alt="" width="116" /><span style="color: #dc870e;"> </span></a><a id="img1017086469" class="imagewidth_1024" href="http://gizmodo.com/5520155/gal-1//gallery/2"><span style="color: #dc870e;"><img class="gpreview-img" src="http://cache-03.gawkerassets.com/assets/images/4/2010/04/gallery_iphone1a.jpg" alt="" width="116" /> </span></a><a id="img1017086486" class="imagewidth_1024" href="http://gizmodo.com/5520155/gal-1//gallery/3"><span style="color: #dc870e;"><img class="gpreview-img" src="http://cache-04.gawkerassets.com/assets/images/4/2010/04/gallery_iphone2.jpg" alt="" width="116" /> </span></a><a id="img1017086503" class="imagewidth_1024" href="http://gizmodo.com/5520155/gal-1//gallery/4"><span style="color: #dc870e;"><img class="gpreview-img" src="http://cache.gawkerassets.com/assets/images/4/2010/04/gallery_iphone3.jpg" alt="" width="116" /> </span></a><a id="img1017086520" class="imagewidth_1024" href="http://gizmodo.com/5520155/gal-1//gallery/5"><span style="color: #dc870e;"><img class="gpreview-img" src="http://cache-01.gawkerassets.com/assets/images/4/2010/04/gallery_iphone4_01.jpg" alt="" width="116" /> </span></a><a id="img1017086537" class="imagewidth_1024" href="http://gizmodo.com/5520155/gal-1//gallery/6"><span style="color: #dc870e;"><img class="gpreview-img" src="http://cache-02.gawkerassets.com/assets/images/4/2010/04/gallery_iphone5.jpg" alt="" width="116" /> </span></a><a id="img1017086554" class="imagewidth_1024" href="http://gizmodo.com/5520155/gal-1//gallery/7"><span style="color: #dc870e;"><img class="gpreview-img" src="http://cache-03.gawkerassets.com/assets/images/4/2010/04/gallery_iphone6.jpg" alt="" width="116" /> </span></a><a id="img1017086571" class="imagewidth_1024" href="http://gizmodo.com/5520155/gal-1//gallery/8"><span style="color: #dc870e;"><img class="gpreview-img" src="http://cache-04.gawkerassets.com/assets/images/4/2010/04/gallery_iphone7.jpg" alt="" width="116" /> </span></a><a id="img1017086588" class="imagewidth_1024" href="http://gizmodo.com/5520155/gal-1//gallery/9"><span style="color: #dc870e;"><img class="gpreview-img" src="http://cache.gawkerassets.com/assets/images/4/2010/04/gallery_iphone8.jpg" alt="" width="116" /> </span></a><a id="img1017086605" class="imagewidth_1024" href="http://gizmodo.com/5520155/gal-1//gallery/10"><span style="color: #dc870e;"><img class="gpreview-img" src="http://cache-01.gawkerassets.com/assets/images/4/2010/04/gallery_iphone9.jpg" alt="" width="116" /> </span></a><a id="img1017086622" class="imagewidth_1024" href="http://gizmodo.com/5520155/gal-1//gallery/11"><span style="color: #dc870e;"><img class="gpreview-img" src="http://cache-02.gawkerassets.com/assets/images/4/2010/04/gallery_iphone10.jpg" alt="" width="116" /> </span></a><a id="img1017086639" class="imagewidth_1024" href="http://gizmodo.com/5520155/gal-1//gallery/12"><span style="color: #dc870e;"><img class="gpreview-img" src="http://cache-03.gawkerassets.com/assets/images/4/2010/04/gallery_iphone11.jpg" alt="" width="116" /> </span></a><a id="img1017086656" class="imagewidth_1024" href="http://gizmodo.com/5520155/gal-1//gallery/13"><span style="color: #dc870e;"><img class="gpreview-img" src="http://cache-04.gawkerassets.com/assets/images/4/2010/04/gallery_iphone12.jpg" alt="" width="116" /> </span></a><a id="img1017086673" class="imagewidth_1024" href="http://gizmodo.com/5520155/gal-1//gallery/14"><span style="color: #dc870e;"><img class="gpreview-img" src="http://cache.gawkerassets.com/assets/images/4/2010/04/gallery_iphone13.jpg" alt="" width="116" /> </span></a><a id="img1017086690" class="imagewidth_1024" href="http://gizmodo.com/5520155/gal-1//gallery/15"><span style="color: #dc870e;"><img class="gpreview-img" src="http://cache-01.gawkerassets.com/assets/images/4/2010/04/gallery_iphone14.jpg" alt="" width="116" /> </span></a><a id="img1017086707" class="imagewidth_1024" href="http://gizmodo.com/5520155/gal-1//gallery/16"><span style="color: #dc870e;"><img class="gpreview-img" src="http://cache-02.gawkerassets.com/assets/images/4/2010/04/gallery_iphone15.jpg" alt="" width="116" /> </span></a><a id="img1017086724" class="imagewidth_1024" href="http://gizmodo.com/5520155/gal-1//gallery/17"><span style="color: #dc870e;"><img class="gpreview-img" src="http://cache-03.gawkerassets.com/assets/images/4/2010/04/gallery_iphone16.jpg" alt="" width="116" /> </span></a></div>
</div>
<p> While Apple may tinker with the final packaging and design of the final phone, it&#8217;s clear that the features in this lost-and-found next-generation iPhone are drastically new and drastically different from what came before. Here&#8217;s the detailed list of our findings:</p>
<h2>What&#8217;s new</h2>
<p>• Front-facing video chat camera<br />
• Improved regular back-camera (the lens is quite noticeably larger than the iPhone 3GS)<br />
• Camera flash<br />
• Micro-SIM instead of standard SIM (like the iPad)<br />
• Improved display. It&#8217;s unclear if it&#8217;s the 960&#215;460 display thrown around before—it certainly looks like it, with the &#8220;Connect to iTunes&#8221; screen displaying much higher resolution than on a 3GS.<br />
• What looks to be a secondary mic for noise cancellation, at the top, next to the headphone jack<br />
• Split buttons for volume<br />
• Power, mute, and volume buttons are all metallic</p>
<h2>What&#8217;s changed</h2>
<p>• The back is entirely flat, made of either glass (more likely) or ceramic or shiny plastic in order for the cell signal to poke through. Tapping on the back makes a more hollow and higher pitched sound compared to tapping on the glass on the front/screen, but that could just be the orientation of components inside making for a different sound<br />
• An aluminum border going completely around the outside<br />
• Slightly smaller screen than the 3GS (but seemingly higher resolution)<br />
• Everything is more squared off<br />
• 3 grams heavier<br />
• 16% Larger battery<br />
• Internals components are shrunken, miniaturized and reduced to make room for the larger battery</p>
<p><!-- videoId: a498dbbd1413e2ca2c --><script type="text/javascript"></script></p>
<div id="obj_3533"><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawkerassets.com/assets/images/4/2010/04/a498dbbd1413e2ca2c.jpg"><img class="left image500" style="display: none;" src="http://cache.gawkerassets.com/assets/images/4/2010/04/500x_a498dbbd1413e2ca2c.jpg" alt="This Is Apple's Next iPhone" width="500" /></a><!-- /videoId: a498dbbd1413e2ca2c --></div>
<h2>Why we think it&#8217;s definitely real</h2>
<p>We&#8217;re as skeptical—if not more—than all of you. We get false tips all the time. But after playing with it for about a week—the overall quality feels exactly like a finished final Apple phone—and disassembling this unit, there is so much evidence stacked in its favor, that there&#8217;s very little possibility that it&#8217;s a fake. In fact, the possibility is almost none. Imagine someone having to use Apple components to design a <em>functioning</em> phone, from scratch, and then disseminating it to people around the world. Pretty much impossible. Here are the reasons, one by one. <strong>It has been reported lost</strong> Apple-connected John Gruber—from Daring Fireball—says that Apple has indeed lost a prototype iPhone and they want it back:</p>
<blockquote><p>
So I called around, and I now believe this is an actual unit from Apple — a unit Apple is very interested in getting back.
</p></blockquote>
<p>Obviously someone found it, and here it is. <strong>The screen</strong> While we couldn&#8217;t get it past the connect to iTunes screen for the reasons listed earlier, the USB cable on that screen was so high quality that it was impossible to discern individual pixels. We can&#8217;t tell you the exact resolution of this next-generation iPhone, but it&#8217;s much higher than the current iPhone 3GS. <strong>The operating system</strong> According to the person who found it, this iPhone was running iPhone OS 4.0 before the <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #iphone4" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/iphone4/"><span style="color: #303030;">iPhone 4</span></a>.0 announcement. The person was able to play with it and see the iPhone 4.0 features. Then, Apple remotely killed the phone before we got access to it. We were unable to restore because each firmware is device specific—3GS firmware only loads on 3GS devices—and the there are no firmwares available for this unreleased phone. Which is another clue to its authenticity.  </p>
<div class="GalleryPreview">
<h3><a href="http://gizmodo.com/5520160/gal-2/gallery/"></a></h3>
<div id="AjaxImagePosts" class="gallery-thumb-wrapper"><a id="img1017086877" class="imagewidth_1024" href="http://gizmodo.com/5520160/gal-2//gallery/1"><img class="gpreview-img" src="http://cache-04.gawkerassets.com/assets/images/4/2010/04/gallery_comp1.jpg" alt="" width="116" /><span style="color: #dc870e;"> </span></a><a id="img1017086894" class="imagewidth_1024" href="http://gizmodo.com/5520160/gal-2//gallery/2"><span style="color: #dc870e;"><img class="gpreview-img" src="http://cache.gawkerassets.com/assets/images/4/2010/04/gallery_comp2.jpg" alt="" width="116" /> </span></a><a id="img1017086911" class="imagewidth_1024" href="http://gizmodo.com/5520160/gal-2//gallery/3"><span style="color: #dc870e;"><img class="gpreview-img" src="http://cache-01.gawkerassets.com/assets/images/4/2010/04/gallery_comp3.jpg" alt="" width="116" /> </span></a><a id="img1017086928" class="imagewidth_1024" href="http://gizmodo.com/5520160/gal-2//gallery/4"><span style="color: #dc870e;"><img class="gpreview-img" src="http://cache-02.gawkerassets.com/assets/images/4/2010/04/gallery_comp4.jpg" alt="" width="116" /> </span></a><a id="img1017086945" class="imagewidth_1024" href="http://gizmodo.com/5520160/gal-2//gallery/5"><span style="color: #dc870e;"><img class="gpreview-img" src="http://cache-03.gawkerassets.com/assets/images/4/2010/04/gallery_comp5.jpg" alt="" width="116" /> </span></a><a id="img1017086962" class="imagewidth_1024" href="http://gizmodo.com/5520160/gal-2//gallery/6"><span style="color: #dc870e;"><img class="gpreview-img" src="http://cache-04.gawkerassets.com/assets/images/4/2010/04/gallery_comp6.jpg" alt="" width="116" /> </span></a><a id="img1017086979" class="imagewidth_1024" href="http://gizmodo.com/5520160/gal-2//gallery/7"><span style="color: #dc870e;"><img class="gpreview-img" src="http://cache.gawkerassets.com/assets/images/4/2010/04/gallery_comp7.jpg" alt="" width="116" /> </span></a><a id="img1017086996" class="imagewidth_1024" href="http://gizmodo.com/5520160/gal-2//gallery/8"><span style="color: #dc870e;"><img class="gpreview-img" src="http://cache-01.gawkerassets.com/assets/images/4/2010/04/gallery_comp8.jpg" alt="" width="116" /> </span></a></div>
</div>
<p>  <strong>It is recognized as an iPhone</strong> This iPhone behaves exactly like an iPhone does when connected to a computer, with the proper boot sequence and &#8220;connect to iTunes&#8221; restore functionality. Xcode and iTunes both see this as an iPhone. Mac OS X&#8217;s System Profiler also reports this as an iPhone in restore mode, which is a natural consequence of remotely wiping the phone, but report <em>different</em> product identifiers (both CPID and CPRV) than either the 3G or the 3GS. <strong>It uses micro-sim</strong> The fact that it uses a micro-sim is a clear indicator that this is a next-generation iPhone. No other cellphone uses this standard at this point in the US.</p>
<p> <a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawkerassets.com/assets/images/4/2010/04/case1.jpg"><img class="left image500" src="http://cache.gawkerassets.com/assets/images/4/2010/04/500x_case1.jpg" alt="This Is Apple's Next iPhone" width="500" /></a></p>
<p><strong>The camouflage case</strong> The case it came inside was a fully developed plastic case to house this phone to disguise it like a 3GS. This wasn&#8217;t just a normal case; it had all the proper <strong>new holes</strong> cut out for the new switches and ports and camera holes and camera flash. But it looks like something from Belkin or Case-Mate. It&#8217;s a perfect disguise. <strong>The fact that it&#8217;s in the wild right now</strong> Logic can also narrow down why this phone is this year&#8217;s iPhone, rather than next year&#8217;s model or one from the previous year&#8217;s, just because it was found in the wild right now. It makes no sense for Apple to be testing 2011&#8217;s model right now, in super finished form—they wouldn&#8217;t be nearly finished with it. The phone also can&#8217;t be last year&#8217;s test model, because last year&#8217;s model (based on the iPhone 3GS teardowns) components were way different. No micro-sim, much bigger logic board, no flash, no front camera, smaller battery and an inferior camera. That only leaves the 2010 model.</p>
<p> <a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawkerassets.com/assets/images/4/2010/04/open13.jpg"><img class="left image500" src="http://cache.gawkerassets.com/assets/images/4/2010/04/500x_open13.jpg" alt="This Is Apple's Next iPhone" width="500" /></a></p>
<p><strong>The guts, the definitive proof</strong> And finally, when we opened it up, we saw multiple components that were clearly labeled <strong>APPLE</strong>. And, because the components were fit extremely well and extremely conformed inside the case (obvious that it was designed FOR this case), it was evident that it was not just a 3G or a 3GS transplanted into another body. That probably wouldn&#8217;t even be possible, with the size constraints of the thinner device and larger battery. <!-- videoId: 1c98dbbd151be3cc94 --><script type="text/javascript"></script></p>
<div id="obj_8542"><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawkerassets.com/assets/images/4/2010/04/1c98dbbd151be3cc94.jpg"><img class="left image500" style="display: none;" src="http://cache.gawkerassets.com/assets/images/4/2010/04/500x_1c98dbbd151be3cc94.jpg" alt="This Is Apple's Next iPhone" width="500" /></a><!-- /videoId: 1c98dbbd151be3cc94 --></div>
<h2>The New Industrial Design</h2>
<p>At first sight, this new iPhone&#8217;s industrial design seems so different from the previous two generations that it could be discarded as just a provisional case. Even while the finish is so perfect that it feels right out of the factory, some of the design language elements that are common to all Apple products are not there. Gone is the flushed screen glass against the metal rim. Gone is the single volume button, replaced by two separate ones. Gone is the seamless rim, and gone are the tapered, curved surfaces.</p>
<p>Despite that, however, this design is not a departure. Not when you frame it with the rest of the Apple product line. It&#8217;s all the contrary: This new iPhone gets back to the simplicity of the iMac and the iPad. In fact, you can argue that the current iPhone 3GS—with its shiny chrome rim and excessively curved back—is out of place compared to the hard edges and <a href="http://gizmodo.com/343641/1960s-braun-products-hold-the-secrets-to-apples-future"><span style="color: #dc870e;"><em>Dieter-Ramish</em> utilitarianism</span></a> of the iMac and the iPad. Next to the iPad, for example, the new iPhone makes sense. It has <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5508895/understanding-the-ipads-industrial-design"><span style="color: #dc870e;">the same feeling, the same functional simplicity</span></a>.</p>
<p>But why the black plastic back, instead of going with an unibody aluminum design? Why the two audio volume buttons? Why the seams? And why doesn&#8217;t the back have any curvature at all?</p>
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawkerassets.com/assets/images/4/2010/04/comp1.jpg"><img class="left image500" src="http://cache.gawkerassets.com/assets/images/4/2010/04/500x_comp1.jpg" alt="This Is Apple's Next iPhone" width="500" /></a></p>
<p><strong>Why the plastic back?</strong><br />
The plastic back is the most obvious of the design choices. The iPad, with its all aluminum back, has seen its Wi-Fi reception radius reduced. The 3G version comes with a large patch on the top, probably big enough to provide with good reception. But the new tiny iPhone doesn&#8217;t have the luxury of space: It needs to provide with as much signal as possible using a very small surface. I&#8217;m sure Jon Ive is dying to get rid of the plastic back, and go iPad-style all the way, but the wireless reception is the most important thing in a cellphone. A necessary aesthetical-functional trade-off.</p>
<p><strong>Why separate volume buttons?</strong><br />
This new iPhone uses separate buttons for the volume instead of the single button that you can find in the iPhone, iPod touch, or iPad. It&#8217;s one of the factors that may indicate that this is a provisional case, until you think about one of the most requested features for Apple&#8217;s phone: A physical button for the camera. The new iPhone has a bigger sensor and a flash, which means that the camera function keeps gaining more weight. It&#8217;s only logical to think that Apple may have implemented this two-button approach to provide with a physical shutter button. It makes sense.</p>
<p><strong>Why the seams?</strong><br />
The seams are perhaps the most surprising aspect of the new design. They don&#8217;t seem to respond to any aesthetic criteria and, in terms of function, we can&#8217;t adventure any explanation. But they <em>don&#8217;t</em> look bad. In fact, the whole effect seems good, like something you will find in a Braun product from the 70s.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s doubtful that the seams are arbitrary, however. Either they will disappear from the final product, or they have a function we can&#8217;t foresee at this time.</p>
<p><strong>Why no tapering or curves?</strong><br />
As you will see in a future article, the new iPhone is so miniaturized and packed that there&#8217;s no room for the tapered, curved surfaces. Everything is as tight as it could get, with no space for anything but electronics.</p>
<h2>The hardware specs</h2>
<p>The phone measures 4.50 by 2.31 by 0.37 inches. It weighs 140 grams. The 3GS weighs 137 grams on a postal scale (and 135 on Apple&#8217;s official measurements). So, in comparison, it&#8217;s 3 grams heavier. The battery is 5.25 WHr at 3.7V, compared to the 3GS battery, which is 4.51 WHr at 3.7V. On the back of the phone, it said it was XX GB, but since we were unable to get the phone to a running state, we couldn&#8217;t see exactly how large it was.</p>
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawkerassets.com/assets/images/4/2010/04/iphone4_01.jpg"><img class="left image500" src="http://cache.gawkerassets.com/assets/images/4/2010/04/500x_iphone4_01.jpg" alt="This Is Apple's Next iPhone" width="500" /></a></p>
<h2>How it feels</h2>
<p>Freaking amazing. As a person who never really liked the round mound of a back in the 3GS, the sleeker, flatter, squarer design is super welcome. It feels sturdier than the 3GS, and much less plasticky. The metal buttons give it a heftier feel—less of a toy—than all previous generations. The closest analog to it would be the original iPhone, which is more square and heavy than its newer brothers.</p>
<p>It feels completely natural up to your face, and the fact that both the front and the back are glossy makes no difference on how well you can hold it without the phone slipping. And because it&#8217;s thinner, it feels even nicer in your pants.</p>
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawkerassets.com/assets/images/4/2010/04/iphone2.jpg"><img class="left image500" src="http://cache.gawkerassets.com/assets/images/4/2010/04/500x_iphone2.jpg" alt="This Is Apple's Next iPhone" width="500" /></a></p>
<h2>What all this means</h2>
<p>Apple has updated the exterior drastically different from the 3G and 3GS. That design is old, it felt out of place compared to the rest of their products and needed desperately to be killed. Now you have a thinner body, a much more pleasant form factor with no wasted space and lots of hard lines. But the design isn&#8217;t the most important part that&#8217;s changed.</p>
<p>They&#8217;ve delivered many of the features people have been waiting for—that damn front camera!—while at the same time upgrading everything else. Flash, better back camera, better battery life and another microphone for better voice clarity. People who bought the 3G two years ago and are now in the perfect position to upgrade and get a dramatically different, and better, phone. If confirmed this summer, and if it performs as we expect, this next-generation iPhone looks like a winner.</p>
<p><em>Much additional reporting and design analysis by Jesus Diaz. Rosa Golijan also contributed.&#8221;</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nsourceit.com/2010/04/19/apples-next-iphone/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How to avoid death by backup in e-Discovery</title>
		<link>http://www.nsourceit.com/2010/04/19/how-to-avoid-death-by-backup-in-e-discovery/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nsourceit.com/2010/04/19/how-to-avoid-death-by-backup-in-e-discovery/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Apr 2010 14:09:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ed Valio</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ED.IT Blog Posting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[backup]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[best practices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ESI]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nsourceit.com/?p=823</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From Information Week:  &#8221;Many organizations are sitting on stockpiles of dangerous materials. No, we&#8217;re not talking about hazardous chemicals or unstable explosives. We mean backup tapes, which are routinely included in requests to produce electronically stored information (ESI) as part of potential or ongoing litigation.
The e-discovery realm is rife with cautionary tales of organizations tripped [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From <a href="http://www.informationweek.com/news/business_intelligence/information_mgt/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=224400402" target="_blank">Information Week</a>:  &#8221;Many organizations are sitting on stockpiles of dangerous materials. No, we&#8217;re not talking about hazardous chemicals or unstable explosives. We mean backup tapes, which are routinely included in requests to produce electronically stored information (ESI) as part of potential or ongoing litigation.</p>
<p>The e-discovery realm is rife with cautionary tales of organizations tripped up by backup tapes. For instance, in 2009 a judge fined a defendant more than $1 million for failing to retrieve information stored on backup tapes. In the same year, the government&#8217;s Office of Federal Housing Enterprise Oversight was compelled by a court to search its off-site disaster recovery backups for ESI, a search that ended up costing the agency $6 million&#8211;a jaw-dropping amount for a single discovery exercise. What&#8217;s even scarier is that the agency wasn&#8217;t even a party in the lawsuit; it had simply been subpoenaed for documents in litigation involving Fannie Mae.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-824" title="tapebackup" src="http://www.nsourceit.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/tapebackup.jpg" alt="" width="425" height="282" /></p>
<p>This article examines the challenges that backup tapes pose. It also discusses strategies organizations can use to reduce the number of tapes that get stockpiled, and it outlines technologies and services that help reduce the cost and time it takes to retrieve ESI from tape.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.informationweek.com/news/business_intelligence/information_mgt/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=224400402" target="_blank">Information Week &#8211; E-Discovery: How To Avoid Death By Backup</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nsourceit.com/2010/04/19/how-to-avoid-death-by-backup-in-e-discovery/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Please do not change your password</title>
		<link>http://www.nsourceit.com/2010/04/12/please-do-not-change-your-password/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nsourceit.com/2010/04/12/please-do-not-change-your-password/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Apr 2010 17:48:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ed Valio</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ED.IT Blog Posting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[best practices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IT departments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tips & tricks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nsourceit.com/?p=793</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From The Boston Globe:  &#8221;To continue reading this story, enter your password now. If you do not have a password, please create one. It must contain a minimum of eight characters, including upper- and lower-case letters and one number. This is for your own good.

Nonsense, of course, but it helps illustrate a point: You will [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From <a href="http://www.boston.com/bostonglobe/ideas/articles/2010/04/11/please_do_not_change_your_password/" target="_blank">The Boston Globe</a>:  &#8221;To continue reading this story, enter your password now. If you do not have a password, please create one. It must contain a minimum of eight characters, including upper- and lower-case letters and one number. This is for your own good.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-794" title="password" src="http://www.nsourceit.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/password.jpg" alt="" width="400" height="286" /></p>
<p>Nonsense, of course, but it helps illustrate a point: You will need a computer password today, maybe a half dozen or more — those secret sign-ins that serve as sentries for everything from Amazon shopping carts to work files to online bank accounts. Just when you have them all sorted out, along comes another “urgent” directive from the bank or IT department — time to reset those codes, for safety’s sake. And the latest lineup of log-ins you’ve concocted won’t last for long, either. Some might temporarily stay in your head, others are jotted on scraps of paper and stuffed in a wallet. A few might be taped to your computer monitor in plain view (or are those are from last year’s batch? Who can remember?).</p>
<p>Now, a study has concluded what lots of us have long suspected: Many of these irritating security measures are a waste of time. The study, by a top researcher at Microsoft, found that instructions intended to spare us from costly computer attacks often exact a much steeper price in the form of user effort and time expended.</p>
<p>“Most security advice simply offers a poor cost-benefit trade-off to users,” wrote its author, Cormac Herley, a principal researcher for Microsoft Research&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.boston.com/bostonglobe/ideas/articles/2010/04/11/please_do_not_change_your_password/" target="_blank">The Boston Globe: Please do not change your password</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nsourceit.com/2010/04/12/please-do-not-change-your-password/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Exchange 2010 SP1 will contain archiving and discovery enhancements</title>
		<link>http://www.nsourceit.com/2010/04/07/exchange-2010-sp1-will-contain-archiving-and-discovery-enhancements/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nsourceit.com/2010/04/07/exchange-2010-sp1-will-contain-archiving-and-discovery-enhancements/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Apr 2010 17:47:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ed Valio</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ED.IT Blog Posting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[archiving]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-Discovery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Exchange]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[upgrades]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nsourceit.com/?p=788</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From the Microsoft Exchange Team Blog:  &#8221;While we appreciate all the positive feedback we&#8217;ve received on Exchange Server 2010, we know you all are eager to find out what&#8217;s been going on in Redmond since November. Today, we are happy to give you a first look at what&#8217;s coming later this year in Exchange Server 2010 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From the <a href="http://msexchangeteam.com/archive/2010/04/07/454533.aspx" target="_blank">Microsoft Exchange Team Blog</a>:  &#8221;While we appreciate all the positive feedback we&#8217;ve received on Exchange Server 2010, we know you all are eager to find out what&#8217;s been going on in Redmond since November. Today, we are happy to give you a first look at what&#8217;s coming later this year in Exchange Server 2010 Service Pack 1 (SP1).  SP1 will include fixes and tweaks in areas you&#8217;ve helped us identify, including a roll-up of the roll-ups we&#8217;ve released to date. I also wanted to flag some of the feature enhancements we&#8217;re excited to bring to you with SP1 including: archiving and discovery enhancements, Outlook Web App (OWA) improvements, mobile user and management improvements, and some highly sought after additional UI for management tasks. This is not an all-inclusive list, so stay tuned for the detailed list coming soon!</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-790" title="exchange-logo" src="http://www.nsourceit.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/exchange-logo.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="298" /></p>
<p>In addition to sharing these details with you, I&#8217;m pleased to let you know that we&#8217;ll be offering a beta of SP1 for download in parallel with TechEd North America this June. This will give you a chance to test drive SP1 and prepare for its official release.</p>
<h3>Archiving and Discovery Enhancements</h3>
<p>With the release of Exchange Server 2010 last November, we introduced integrated archiving capabilities aimed at helping you preserve and discover e-mail data. In SP1, we&#8217;ve enhanced this archiving functionality based on the great feedback you&#8217;ve given us since our launch. This includes adding the flexibility to provision a user&#8217;s Personal Archive to a different mailbox database from their primary mailbox. This means your organization can now more easily implement separate storage strategies (or tiered storage) for less frequently accessed e-mail. And, we didn&#8217;t just stop there! We&#8217;ve also added new server side capabilities so you can import historical e-mail data from .PST files, directly into Exchange, as well as IT pro controls to enable delegate access to a user&#8217;s Personal Archive.</p>
<p>To help streamline the implementation of retention policies, SP1 updates the Exchange Management Console with new tools to create Retention Policy Tags, so you can automate the deletion and archiving of e-mail and other Exchange items. New optional Retention Policy Tags give you even more flexibility in defining your organizations retention management strategy.</p>
<p>Lastly, we&#8217;ve made several improvements to the Multi-Mailbox Search features, which can be used to conduct e-Discovery of e-mail for legal, regulatory or other reasons. A new search preview helps with, for example, early case assessment by providing you an estimate on the number of items in the result set-with keyword statistics-before e-mail located in the search are copied to the designated discovery mailbox. And, you now have a new search result de-duplication option, that when checked, only copies one instance of a message to the discovery mailbox. This can help you reduce the amount of e-mail you need to review following the search. Finally, added support for annotation of reviewed items means you can make your e-Discovery workflow even more efficient and less time consuming or costly.</p>
<p>For those of you that have been holding your breath for this one, we&#8217;re also happy to let you know that in SP1 timeframe, there will be an update which will enable us to support access to a user&#8217;s Personal Archive with Outlook 2007.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://msexchangeteam.com/archive/2010/04/07/454533.aspx" target="_blank">The Microsoft Exchange Team Blog &#8211; Yes Virginia, there is an Exchange Server 2010 SP1</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nsourceit.com/2010/04/07/exchange-2010-sp1-will-contain-archiving-and-discovery-enhancements/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A primer on e-Discovery ethics</title>
		<link>http://www.nsourceit.com/2010/04/01/a-primer-on-e-discovery-ethics/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nsourceit.com/2010/04/01/a-primer-on-e-discovery-ethics/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Apr 2010 18:26:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ed Valio</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ED.IT Blog Posting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-Discovery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[case law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ESI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ethics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nsourceit.com/?p=769</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From Practical e-Discovery:  &#8221;Lawson v. Sun Microsystems, Inc., 2010 WL 503054 (S.D. Ind. February 8, 2010) - Lawson is an ediscovery decision that has flown under the radar of most bloggers and legal commentators. It is a relatively short opinion, addressing whether sanctions should be imposed on the plaintiff and his former attorneys after the plaintiff [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From <a href="http://blog.hinshawlaw.com/practicalediscovery/2010/03/29/a-primer-on-ediscovery-ethics/" target="_blank">Practical e-Discovery</a>:  &#8221;Lawson v. Sun Microsystems, Inc., 2010 WL 503054 (S.D. Ind. February 8, 2010) - Lawson is an ediscovery decision that has flown under the radar of most bloggers and legal commentators. It is a relatively short opinion, addressing whether sanctions should be imposed on the plaintiff and his former attorneys after the plaintiff unlocked certain password-protected documents produced by defendant in discovery that were privileged. The decision, however, implicates a number of ethical issues and the case could be used in teaching a course on ediscovery ethics.  Because of the brevity of the district court’s opinion, many of the facts discussed below are taken from the Magistrate’s Report and Recommendation which can be read <a href="http://www.scribd.com/doc/29109552" target="_blank">here</a>.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-770" title="ethics" src="http://www.nsourceit.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/ethics.gif" alt="" width="410" height="300" /></p>
<p>The Magistrate, in addressing the defendant’s sanctions motion, described the issues presented by that motion as:</p>
<p>&#8216;[T]he perfect storm of problems that can arise from voluminous electronic discovery in high stakes litigation. As with the storm of any magnitude – and this one might qualify as a Category 5 from the National Hurricane Center – the damage can be severe. Such is the case in the wake of this maelstrom.&#8217;</p>
<p>The defendant claimed in its motion for sanctions that the case was an &#8216;ediscovery version of Watergate,&#8217; with the plaintiff acting as &#8216;the henchman who broke into the password-protected documents&#8217; and his counsel engaging in the &#8216;cover-up.&#8217; The district court, however, was not persuaded. While a relatively modest monetary sanction was imposed upon the plaintiff, the district court ultimately vacated the Magistrate’s recommended monetary sanction on plaintiff’s former counsel. Even when the defendant’s hyperbole is ignored, Lawson presents a number of knotty ethical issues that practitioners must be ready to recognize and properly address.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://blog.hinshawlaw.com/practicalediscovery/2010/03/29/a-primer-on-ediscovery-ethics/" target="_blank">Practical e-Discovery &#8211; A Primer on e-Discovery ethics</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nsourceit.com/2010/04/01/a-primer-on-e-discovery-ethics/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Early adopters very satisfied with Windows 7</title>
		<link>http://www.nsourceit.com/2010/03/29/early-adopters-very-satisfied-with-windows-7/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nsourceit.com/2010/03/29/early-adopters-very-satisfied-with-windows-7/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Mar 2010 21:50:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ed Valio</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ED.IT Blog Posting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[early adopters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[upgrade]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows 7]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nsourceit.com/?p=672</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From ARS Technica:  &#8221;Windows 7 adoption and satisfaction have both been exceptionally high from the start, according to two new reports from Forrester Research. The first report notes that the early adopters which drive the initial success of most tech products are very satisfied with the key new features; consumers who adopted Windows 7 in [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://arstechnica.com/microsoft/news/2010/03/early-adopters-very-satisfied-with-windows-7.ars" target="_blank">From ARS Technica</a>:  &#8221;Windows 7 adoption and satisfaction have both been exceptionally high from the start, according to two new reports from Forrester Research. The first report notes that the early adopters which drive the initial success of most tech products are very satisfied with the key new features; consumers who adopted Windows 7 in forth quarter were generally very satisfied with their PCs. The second notes that Windows 7 has been very good at raising awareness, though Microsoft still faces the challenges of making sure it lives up to the lasting legacy of Windows XP while at the same time overcoming consumers&#8217; painful memory of Windows Vista. The reports are based on Forrester&#8217;s Consumer Technographics data.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><img class="aligncenter size-medium wp-image-673" title="windows_7_logo_from_wallpaper" src="http://nsourceit.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/windows_7_logo_from_wallpaper-271x271.jpg" alt="" width="271" height="271" /></p>
<p>Windows 7 penetrated the consciousness of the market by the end of 2009, with a strong majority of US consumers aware of the product. Forrester also noticed that the operating system started to break a well-known trend: historically most consumers acquire new operating systems when they purchase their new PC. With Windows 7, however, upgrade behavior was much stronger&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://arstechnica.com/microsoft/news/2010/03/early-adopters-very-satisfied-with-windows-7.ars" target="_blank">ARS Technica &#8211; Early adopters very satisfied with Windows 7</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nsourceit.com/2010/03/29/early-adopters-very-satisfied-with-windows-7/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google intros Exchange migration tool for small businesses</title>
		<link>http://www.nsourceit.com/2010/03/18/google-intros-exchange-migration-tool-for-small-businesses/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nsourceit.com/2010/03/18/google-intros-exchange-migration-tool-for-small-businesses/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 17:58:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ed Valio</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ED.IT Blog Posting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Exchange]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nsourceit.com/?p=664</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From ARS Technica:  &#8221;Google is continuing its quiet war on Microsoft Office by making it easier for users to switch from Exchange to Google Apps for e-mail. The company has launched a new server-side tool called Google Apps Migration for Microsoft® Exchange, which not only migrates your company e-mail, but also moves your calendar and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://arstechnica.com/business/news/2010/03/google-creepin-on-microsoft-again-with-exchange-tool.ars" target="_blank">From ARS Technica</a>:  &#8221;Google is continuing its quiet war on Microsoft Office by making it easier for users to switch from Exchange to Google Apps for e-mail. The company has launched a new server-side tool called Google Apps Migration for Microsoft® Exchange, which not only migrates your company e-mail, but also moves your calendar and contact info into the cloud.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><img class="aligncenter size-medium wp-image-668" title="exchange" src="http://nsourceit.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/exchange-271x406.gif" alt="" width="271" height="406" /></p>
<p>According to Google&#8217;s Enterprise Blog, the migration is only four steps long and works quickly to bring in the information that you choose. There&#8217;s even the option to import the data in phases, which makes life easier if there&#8217;s too much to bring in at any one time. The tool works with both hosted and on-premise Microsoft Exchange 2003 or 2007 and is free to those who already subscribe to Google Apps Premier and Education edition.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://arstechnica.com/business/news/2010/03/google-creepin-on-microsoft-again-with-exchange-tool.ars" target="_blank">ARS Technica &#8211; Google intros Exchange migration tool for small businesses</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nsourceit.com/2010/03/18/google-intros-exchange-migration-tool-for-small-businesses/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
