<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>nSourceIT &#187; sanctions</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.nsourceit.com/tag/sanctions/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.nsourceit.com</link>
	<description>Information Technology, e-Discovery, and Litigation Support Services</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 24 Jul 2011 23:55:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>&#8221;Win-At-All-Costs&#8221; Litigation Using Illegal e-Discovery Leads to Dismissal of a Billion Dollar Case</title>
		<link>http://www.nsourceit.com/2010/11/01/win-at-all-costs-litigation-using-illegal-e-discovery-leads-to-dismissal-of-a-billion-dollar-case/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nsourceit.com/2010/11/01/win-at-all-costs-litigation-using-illegal-e-discovery-leads-to-dismissal-of-a-billion-dollar-case/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Nov 2010 19:24:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ed Valio</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ED.IT Blog Posting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-Discovery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ESI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ralph Losey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sanctions]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nsourceit.com/?p=908</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From Ralph Losey&#8217;s E-Discovery Team: &#8221;Last week I mentioned the mean streets of litigation and my guess that most judges do not know how bad it has become. Two federal judges in South Florida know: District Court Judge Patricia A. Seitz and Magistrate Judge John J. O’Sullivan. Leor Exploration &#38; Production LLC v. Aguiar, 2010 WL 3782195 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From Ralph Losey&#8217;s <em>E-Discovery Team</em>: &#8221;Last week I mentioned the <em>mean streets of litigation</em> and my guess that most judges do not know how bad it has become. Two federal judges in South Florida know: District Court Judge Patricia A. Seitz and Magistrate Judge John J. O’Sullivan. <em><a href="http://ralphlosey.files.wordpress.com/2010/10/loehr-v-aguiar.doc">Leor Exploration &amp; Production LLC v. Aguiar</a>,</em> 2010 WL 3782195 (Sept. 28, 2010, S.D.Fl.). They have seen and responded to some real Dr. Evil type of conduct by the defendant in this case over One Billion Dollars. &lt;Dr. Evil laugh goes here.&gt; The misconduct culminated in illegal e-discovery where defendant hacked into the opposing party’s email and read his lawyers’ advice and strategies for the case. Judge O’Sullivan found, and Judge Seitz agreed, that defendant had a “win-at-all-costs mentality regarding this litigation.” <em>Leor, supra</em> at *4.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-909" title="duel" src="http://www.nsourceit.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/11/duel.jpg" alt="" width="530" height="379" /></p>
<p><em>Leor Exploration &amp; Production LLC v. Aguiar </em>is the name here given to a group of interrelated commercial litigation cases arising out of a multi-billion dollar oil and gas discovery. There were multiple claims and counter-claims, including fraud, breach of contract, and negligence. It also involved a bitter family rivalry. When Judges O’Sullivan and Seitz were shown clear and convincing evidence of what the individual defendant had done, they responded as they needed to do to protect the American legal system. They threw out his claims. Assuming this sanction order<em> </em>is upheld on appeal to the Eleventh Circuit, it will stand as the largest e-discovery sanction case in history.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://e-discoveryteam.com/2010/11/01/win-at-all-costs-litigation-using-illegal-e-discovery-leads-to-dismissal-of-a-billion-dollar-case/" target="_blank">E-Discovery Team &#8211; &#8221;Win-At-All-Costs&#8221; Litigation Using Illegal e-Discovery Leads to Dismissal of a Billion Dollar Case</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nsourceit.com/2010/11/01/win-at-all-costs-litigation-using-illegal-e-discovery-leads-to-dismissal-of-a-billion-dollar-case/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>In-House Counsel Sanctioned for Defendant’s Failure to Preserve Evidence</title>
		<link>http://www.nsourceit.com/2009/11/01/in-house-counsel-sanctioned-for-defendant%e2%80%99s-failure-to-preserve/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nsourceit.com/2009/11/01/in-house-counsel-sanctioned-for-defendant%e2%80%99s-failure-to-preserve/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 02:34:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ed Valio</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ED.IT Blog Posting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-Discovery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eDiscovery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ESI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[in-house counsel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sanctions]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nsource.info/?p=559</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From Ralph Losey&#8217;s &#8220;e-Discovery Team&#8221; blog:
&#8221;Many courts have imposed monetary sanctions against outside counsel of record for their negligence in working with their clients to preserve evidence. See eg., Green v. McClendon, 2009 WL 2496275 (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 13, 2009) (discussed before in Mathematical Formula for Justice Proves the Importance of ESI in Civil Litigation). But [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From <a href="http://ralphlosey.wordpress.com/2009/11/01/in-house-counsel-sanctioned-for-defendants-failure-to-preserve-evidence/" target="_blank">Ralph Losey&#8217;s &#8220;e-Discovery Team&#8221; blog</a>:</p>
<p>&#8221;Many courts have imposed monetary sanctions against outside counsel of record for their negligence in working with their clients to preserve evidence. See eg., Green v. McClendon, 2009 WL 2496275 (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 13, 2009) (discussed before in Mathematical Formula for Justice Proves the Importance of ESI in Civil Litigation). But this decision goes a step further and reaches behind the curtain to impose sanctions against in-house counsel. This was not your typical in-house counsel situation either. It was not a remote in-house attorney representing a large corporation. The attorney sanctioned was the general counsel for a local governmental entity, the Seminole County Sheriff’s Department.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://nsource.info/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/footprint.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-medium wp-image-560" style="border: 0px;" title="footprint" src="http://nsource.info/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/footprint-271x180.jpg" alt="footprint" width="271" height="180" /></a></p>
<p>This District Court opinion has not been published yet, but I expect it will be soon. It is, as far as I know, the first in the country to impose a monetary sanction against an in-house counsel who was not an attorney of record and was not a named party. The amount of the sanction has not yet been determined by the District Court judge who entered the order, but it will be substantial. The plaintiff incurred costs and attorney fees in excess of $300,000 to bring and prove the sanctions motion.&#8221;</p>
<p>Read more &#8211; <a href="http://ralphlosey.wordpress.com/2009/11/01/in-house-counsel-sanctioned-for-defendants-failure-to-preserve-evidence/">e-Discovery Team: In-House Counsel Sanctioned for Defendant’s Failure to Preserve Evidence</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nsourceit.com/2009/11/01/in-house-counsel-sanctioned-for-defendant%e2%80%99s-failure-to-preserve/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

